Abstract

A Descriptive Interpretation of Flexible Work Arrangements (FWA) and Their Impact on Organizational Outcomes

Aditi Singh

Volume: 13 Issue: 4 2023

Abstract:

The evolving nature of work has led to an increasing adoption of flexible work arrangements (FWAs) by organizations seeking to enhance employee satisfaction and productivity. This study investigates the impact of FWAs—such as telecommuting, flextime, and compressed workweeks—on organizational outcomes including employee performance, job satisfaction, and retention. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature and empirical research, the analysis reveals that FWAs can lead to significant improvements in employee morale and productivity, reduce turnover rates, and foster a more inclusive work environment. However, the success of these arrangements largely depends on the organizational culture, the nature of the work, and the management practices in place. This study highlights the need for a strategic approach to implementing FWAs, ensuring alignment with organizational goals and employee needs to optimize the potential benefits. The findings offer valuable insights for managers and policymakers aiming to leverage FWAs to achieve better organizational performance and employee well-being.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v13i04.016

Back Download

References

• Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(1), 6-22.
• Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, N., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 151-169.
• Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2003). Work and family: A comparative perspective. Social Forces, 81(2), 581-611.
• Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165-218.
• Bolino, M. C., & Klotz, A. C. (2019). The role of flexible work arrangements in reducing work-family conflict: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 319-335.
• Chesley, N. (2005). Workplace flexibility and work–family conflict: The roles of gender, family role quality, and work role quality. Social Science Research, 34(1), 1-19.
• De Menezes, L. M., & Kelliher, C. (2011). Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(4), 452-474.
• Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive effects of perceived flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49-58.
• Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). Overworked individuals or overworked families? Explaining trends in work and family life. Work and Occupations, 31(1), 24-48.
• Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83-106.
• Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139-149.
• Lambert, S. J. (2000). Added benefits: The link between work-life benefits and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 801-815.
• Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2006). The impact of flexible working arrangements on employees’ job satisfaction and well-being. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(3), 537-555.
• MacDonald, C. L., & McNall, L. A. (2016). The relationship between flexible work arrangements and employee outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Issues, 28(3), 364-389.
• Masuda, A. D., & Holtom, B. C. (2013). The effect of flexible work arrangements on employee attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 389-411.
• Matusik, S. F., & Mickel, A. E. (2011). Flexible work arrangements: How can organizations support employee flexibility? Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 108-123.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
• Moen, P., & Yu, Y. (2000). Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work flexibility, and work-family conflict. Social Problems, 47(3), 291-317.
• Peeters, M. C. W., & Rutte, C. G. (2005). The work and family interface: A review of organizational and individual outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(5), 386-402.
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1107-1117.
• Schieman, S., & Glavin, P. (2008). Nonstandard work and the life course: A research agenda. Social Forces, 86(4), 1271-1287.
• Shapiro, D. L., & Kirkman, B. L. (2004). The effects of flexible work arrangements on the motivation and performance of employees. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1), 36-50.
• Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2012). Motivating the workforce through flexible work arrangements. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 219-238.
• Smith, J. L., & Hill, S. (2007). Flexible work arrangements and work-life balance: Exploring the role of gender. Work and Occupations, 34(3), 348-369.
• Sturges, J., & Guest, D. E. (2001). Work–life balance and the psychological contract: Understanding the link between work–life balance and organizational outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1811-1831.
• Van Der Lippe, T., & Lippényi, Z. (2016). Flexible work arrangements and the work–family interface. International Sociology Review of Books, 31(4), 200-216.
• Williams, J. C., & Boushey, H. (2010). The Three Faces of Work-Family Conflict: The Poor, the Professionals, and the Missing Middle. Center for American Progress.